Changes

38 bytes removed ,  22:58, November 1, 2020
→‎Opinion: Replaced dead link.
Line 39: Line 39:     
====White====
 
====White====
−
[[Byron White]]'s dissent in ''Roe v. Wade'' was owed to his findings that nowhere in the Constitution supports the majority of the Court's opinion. He is known to have said: "The Court simply fashions and announces a new constitutional right for pregnant mothers, and, with scarcely any reason or authority for its action, invests that right with sufficient substance to override most existing state abortion statutes." White also concluded that the Court's majority opinion values convenience over potential life and that its ruling in prohibiting the protection of that potential life was unacceptable to him.<ref>[http://www.americasfuture.net/2001/jan01/01-0121a.html White's Vigorous Dissent in Roe v. Wade]</ref>
+
[[Byron White]]'s dissent in ''Roe v. Wade'' was owed to his findings that nowhere in the Constitution supports the majority of the Court's opinion. He is known to have said: "The Court simply fashions and announces a new constitutional right for pregnant mothers, and, with scarcely any reason or authority for its action, invests that right with sufficient substance to override most existing state abortion statutes." White also concluded that the Court's majority opinion values convenience over potential life and that its ruling in prohibiting the protection of that potential life was unacceptable to him.<ref>https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade/Dissent_White</ref>
    
==Subsequent jurisprudence==
 
==Subsequent jurisprudence==
SkipCaptcha
4,063

edits