Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bostock v. Clayton County"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I apologize, I originally thought that Aimee Stephens was biologically born female. I guess I was wrong. So thank you for correcting my use of addressing him as a female. | + | I apologize, I originally thought that Aimee Stephens was biologically born female. I guess I was wrong. So thank you for correcting my use of addressing him as a female.[[User:Isaiahbc|Isaiahbc]] ([[User talk:Isaiahbc|talk]]) 17:31, 9 December 2020 (EST) |
| − | Does the first paragraph need more support for its claims? I agree with the information, but should there be more foundation given for why the information is true? Such as, why is the ruling illegal? | + | Does the first paragraph need more support for its claims? I agree with the information, but should there be more foundation given for why the information is true? Such as, why is the ruling illegal?[[User:Isaiahbc|Isaiahbc]] ([[User talk:Isaiahbc|talk]]) 17:31, 9 December 2020 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 22:31, December 9, 2020
I apologize, I originally thought that Aimee Stephens was biologically born female. I guess I was wrong. So thank you for correcting my use of addressing him as a female.Isaiahbc (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2020 (EST)
Does the first paragraph need more support for its claims? I agree with the information, but should there be more foundation given for why the information is true? Such as, why is the ruling illegal?Isaiahbc (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2020 (EST)