Difference between revisions of "Loose constructionism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page for loose constructionism and made it look similar to the page for strict constructionism.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 04:32, December 24, 2020
Loose constructionism is a judicial principle, first developed by Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Party, which interprets provisions of the United States Constitution broadly.
Loose constructionists say that courts should practice judicial activism by abiding by what the Constitution figuratively says. The converse of this is the idea that the United States Constitution should be interpreted strictly, refusing to creating new rights that aren't explicitly in the Constitution. The Constitution itself spells out the procedures for amending the document to include new rights. Loose constructionists disrespect this process, unlike strict constructionists.