Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Improvement"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
This page is a good idea.  I think the key is to have one, strong resource like this that is ''easy to find'' for editors.  I did notice a new welcome template that attempted something like this.  Anyway, this page could stay short and concise and have links to in-depth help on how to work each of its subjects, I think.  For instance, under linking, make mention of finding "good" links, not just redding up the article.  Often a file will not have the name one thinks it will, so one should search for the term first. [[User:Human|Human]] 19:59, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
 
This page is a good idea.  I think the key is to have one, strong resource like this that is ''easy to find'' for editors.  I did notice a new welcome template that attempted something like this.  Anyway, this page could stay short and concise and have links to in-depth help on how to work each of its subjects, I think.  For instance, under linking, make mention of finding "good" links, not just redding up the article.  Often a file will not have the name one thinks it will, so one should search for the term first. [[User:Human|Human]] 19:59, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
  
−
==Abraham Lincoln==
+
==[[Abraham Lincoln]]==
 
Why does it need major improvement?  It's on the top 14 articles needing improvement.  I don't see anything really wrong when I go to the page.  I think it should be taken off the list and have another article needing improvement put on instead.  [[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 15:16, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
Why does it need major improvement?  It's on the top 14 articles needing improvement.  I don't see anything really wrong when I go to the page.  I think it should be taken off the list and have another article needing improvement put on instead.  [[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 15:16, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 19:16, May 21, 2007

AID

I was about to add it. --CPAdmin1 17:40, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

This page is a good idea. I think the key is to have one, strong resource like this that is easy to find for editors. I did notice a new welcome template that attempted something like this. Anyway, this page could stay short and concise and have links to in-depth help on how to work each of its subjects, I think. For instance, under linking, make mention of finding "good" links, not just redding up the article. Often a file will not have the name one thinks it will, so one should search for the term first. Human 19:59, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

Abraham Lincoln

Why does it need major improvement? It's on the top 14 articles needing improvement. I don't see anything really wrong when I go to the page. I think it should be taken off the list and have another article needing improvement put on instead. Additioner 15:16, 21 May 2007 (EDT)