| − | Global Warming is apparently broadly believed in by insurance companies, who have a great deal to lose if they guess incorrectly about future natural disasters. <ref>[http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/08/22/PM200608222.html Marketplace: Global warming insurance]</ref><ref>[http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1013/p01s01-usec.html Christian Science Monitor: New combatant against global warming: insurance industry]</ref> | + | Global Warming is apparently broadly believed in by insurance companies{{fact}}, who have a great deal to lose if they guess incorrectly about future natural disasters. <ref>[http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2006/08/22/PM200608222.html Marketplace: Global warming insurance]</ref><ref>[http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1013/p01s01-usec.html Christian Science Monitor: New combatant against global warming: insurance industry]</ref> |
| − | The industry most opposed to the Global Warming Hypothesis is, unsurprisingly, the fossil-fuel industry, such as the Exxon-Mobil sponsored <ref>http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=9</ref>[[American Enterprise Institute]] offering $10,000 to scientists and journalists willing to dispute global-warming studies.<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2004230,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=11 Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study]</ref> | + | The industry most opposed{{fact}} to the global warming hypothesis is the fossil-fuel industry, such as the Exxon-Mobil sponsored <ref>http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=9</ref>[[American Enterprise Institute]] offering $10,000 to scientists and journalists willing to dispute global-warming studies.<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2004230,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=11 Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study]</ref> |