Difference between revisions of "Talk:Politicization of science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(Additional source material) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Perhaps a vandal may succeed in ''getting'' on, but ''keeping'' it on the list is actually slightly less likely than flying pigs. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 17:48, 21 May 2007 (EDT) | Perhaps a vandal may succeed in ''getting'' on, but ''keeping'' it on the list is actually slightly less likely than flying pigs. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 17:48, 21 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Additional source material - [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070522/ap_on_sc/smithsonian_climate_change Smithsonian accused of altering exhibit]. | ||
| + | : WASHINGTON - The Smithsonian Institution toned down an exhibit on climate change in the Arctic for fear of angering Congress and the Bush administration, says a former administrator at the museum. | ||
| + | --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 15:28, 22 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:28, May 22, 2007
I suppose getting 'abortion causes cancer' on this list is about as likely as pigs flying, right? --Gulik3 17:44, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps a vandal may succeed in getting on, but keeping it on the list is actually slightly less likely than flying pigs. --Ben Talk 17:48, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Additional source material - Smithsonian accused of altering exhibit.
- WASHINGTON - The Smithsonian Institution toned down an exhibit on climate change in the Arctic for fear of angering Congress and the Bush administration, says a former administrator at the museum.
--Mtur 15:28, 22 May 2007 (EDT)