Difference between revisions of "Talk:National Review"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
:Thanks. I'd like to see the establishment of a Manual of Style which tells us when to use '''bold''' and ''italics''. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Thanks. I'd like to see the establishment of a Manual of Style which tells us when to use '''bold''' and ''italics''. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:*Magazine titles: ''The National Review'', ''The New Yorker'', ''Scientific American''
 
:*Magazine titles: ''The National Review'', ''The New Yorker'', ''Scientific American''
 +
 +
Is this all for ''The National Review''?

Revision as of 22:16, May 22, 2007

Yes

I believe that you were correct to italicize this, Ed. MountainDew 13:30, 28 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks. I'd like to see the establishment of a Manual of Style which tells us when to use bold and italics. --Ed Poor 15:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
  • Magazine titles: The National Review, The New Yorker, Scientific American

Is this all for The National Review?