Difference between revisions of "Debate:Is environmentalism mostly about preserving natural resources?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: {{debate}} ==YES== ==NO==) |
(→YES: Here's one side - not sure I agree.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==YES== | ==YES== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The desire to conserve natural resources for human appreciation and use was extended to treating the entire planet as the human "environment". So environmentalism just means taking care of nature in the sense of Genesis 1:28, some say. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:27, 22 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
==NO== | ==NO== | ||
Revision as of 00:27, May 23, 2007
| ! | THIS IS A DEBATE PAGE, NOT AN ARTICLE. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Conservapedia. Your opinion is welcome! Please remember to sign your comments on this page, and refrain from editing other user's contributions. New Users: Please read our "Editing etiquette" before posting |
|
YES
The desire to conserve natural resources for human appreciation and use was extended to treating the entire planet as the human "environment". So environmentalism just means taking care of nature in the sense of Genesis 1:28, some say. --Ed Poor 20:27, 22 May 2007 (EDT)