Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
27 bytes added ,  23:09, March 1, 2007
Dr. Brown footnote
Line 5: Line 5:  
The Earth is approximately 8000 miles (13000 km) in diameter, so its circumference is approximately 8000&middot;&pi; = about 25,000 miles (40,000 km). Its surface area is approximately 4&middot;&pi;&nbsp;(4000 mi)<sup>2</sup> = 200 million square miles (510 million km<sup>2</sup>). It has been said that Earth should really be called "water:" most of the Earth's surface, about 70%, is covered by water. In fact, the Pacific and Indian oceans alone cover about half of the Earth.
 
The Earth is approximately 8000 miles (13000 km) in diameter, so its circumference is approximately 8000&middot;&pi; = about 25,000 miles (40,000 km). Its surface area is approximately 4&middot;&pi;&nbsp;(4000 mi)<sup>2</sup> = 200 million square miles (510 million km<sup>2</sup>). It has been said that Earth should really be called "water:" most of the Earth's surface, about 70%, is covered by water. In fact, the Pacific and Indian oceans alone cover about half of the Earth.
   −
Estimates by non-creationist geologists of the age of the Earth have varied over the years; currently, most scientists believe the age of the Earth to be about 4.5 billion years. In addition, most scientists also believe believe that the earth formed by natural processes instead of being supernaturally created. However, as one scientist recently noted, “... most every prediction by theorists about planetary formation has been wrong.” [http://creationwiki.org/Astronomy_quotes]
+
Estimates by non-creationist geologists of the age of the Earth have varied over the years; currently, most scientists believe the age of the Earth to be about 4.5 billion years. In addition, most scientists also believe believe that the earth formed by natural processes instead of being supernaturally created. However, as one scientist recently noted, “... most every prediction by theorists about planetary formation has been wrong.” [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes43.html]
    
Bible scholars have also estimated the age of the earth based on the Creation account in Genesis and the genealogical accounts in Numbers and other books of the Pentateuch. One famous estimate was published in 1650 by R. B. Knox, James Ussher Archbishop of Armagh (usually referred to as Archbishop Ussher) in a book called ''Annals of the World,'' in which he estimated the Creation to have occurred on 23 October 4004 B.C. Other Biblical scholars maintain that there are possible gaps in the genealogies, often using the ideas of the 19th century Calvinist theologian Benjamin Warfield on the issue. <ref>http://www.reasons.org/resources/apologetics/primeval_chronology.shtml</ref>  
 
Bible scholars have also estimated the age of the earth based on the Creation account in Genesis and the genealogical accounts in Numbers and other books of the Pentateuch. One famous estimate was published in 1650 by R. B. Knox, James Ussher Archbishop of Armagh (usually referred to as Archbishop Ussher) in a book called ''Annals of the World,'' in which he estimated the Creation to have occurred on 23 October 4004 B.C. Other Biblical scholars maintain that there are possible gaps in the genealogies, often using the ideas of the 19th century Calvinist theologian Benjamin Warfield on the issue. <ref>http://www.reasons.org/resources/apologetics/primeval_chronology.shtml</ref>  
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,811

edits

Navigation menu