Changes

no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
On Conservapedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article.
 
On Conservapedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article.
   −
Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable, independent sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below.
+
Information on Conservapedia must be verifiable; if no reliable, independent sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Conservapedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below.
    
A topic is presumed to merit an article if:
 
A topic is presumed to merit an article if:
    
It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG) listed in the box on the right; and
 
It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG) listed in the box on the right; and
−
It is not excluded under the What Wikipedia is not policy.
+
It is not excluded under the What Conservapedia is not policy.
    
==Notability for Academics==
 
==Notability for Academics==
19

edits