| Line 85: |
Line 85: |
| | Hiss maintained his innocence until he died, despite the eventual release of secret Soviet files apparently identifying him as a spy. Perhaps Hiss felt he could not go back on his prior statements, or perhaps he remained true to communism in protecting the movement. The case helped define American politics for forty years, propelling Nixon to the Vice Presidency in 1952, Barry Goldwater to the Republican nomination for president in 1964, Nixon to the White House in 1968, and ultimately Ronald Reagan to the White House in 1980, where he awarded Chambers a posthumous Medal of Freedom. | | Hiss maintained his innocence until he died, despite the eventual release of secret Soviet files apparently identifying him as a spy. Perhaps Hiss felt he could not go back on his prior statements, or perhaps he remained true to communism in protecting the movement. The case helped define American politics for forty years, propelling Nixon to the Vice Presidency in 1952, Barry Goldwater to the Republican nomination for president in 1964, Nixon to the White House in 1968, and ultimately Ronald Reagan to the White House in 1980, where he awarded Chambers a posthumous Medal of Freedom. |
| | | | |
| − | 8. In a famous recent trial, former football star O. J. Simpson was acquitted by a jury of the crime of murdering his wife. The key argument in the trial was that the prosecutions' key witness, the policeman who gathered most of the evidence in the case, was shown to have lied, and the jury apparently found the argument that he may have tampered with the evidence credible, at least to the extent of giving them a "reasonable doubt." In an apparently contradictory finding, a different jury found in a civil case ("lawsuit") that O. J. Simpson was responsible for the death of his wife, and assessed civil penalties. Since the standards of proof is "preponderance of evidence" in a civil case, however, it is much easier to prove civil liability to a jury than it is to prove criminal guilt, and hence these results are not necessarily contradictory. | + | 8. In a famous recent trial, former football star O. J. Simpson was acquitted by a jury of the crime of murdering his wife. The key argument in the trial was that the prosecutions' key witness, the policeman who gathered most of the evidence in the case, was shown to have lied, and the jury apparently found the argument that he may have tampered with the evidence credible, at least to the extent of giving them a "reasonable doubt." In an apparently contradictory finding, a different jury found in a civil case ("lawsuit") that O.J. Simpson was responsible for the death of his wife, and assessed civil penalties. Since the standards of proof is "preponderance of evidence" in a civil case, however, it is much easier to prove civil liability to a jury than it is to prove criminal guilt, and hence these results are not necessarily contradictory. |
| | | | |
| | 9. [[George Zimmerman]] was prosecuted for second-degree murder due to a killing he said was in [[self-defense]]. He was unanimously acquitted by the [[jury]]. | | 9. [[George Zimmerman]] was prosecuted for second-degree murder due to a killing he said was in [[self-defense]]. He was unanimously acquitted by the [[jury]]. |
| | | | |
| | + | == Impartial jury == |
| | + | |
| | + | As observed by the [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]], one of the "most essential elements of a successful jury trial is an impartial jury." ''Shinal v. Toms'', 162 A.3d 429, 438 (Pa. 2017) (quoting ''Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hosp. of City of Phila.'', 619 Pa. 135, 58 A.3d 102, 109 (Pa. 2012)). |
| | [[Category:Law]] | | [[Category:Law]] |
| | [[Category:Judicial]] | | [[Category:Judicial]] |
| | [[Category:Seventh Amendment]] | | [[Category:Seventh Amendment]] |
| | [[Category:Bill of Rights]] | | [[Category:Bill of Rights]] |