Difference between revisions of "Talk:Code of Unrighteous Acts"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(code of unrighteous acts: Basically information free - Tisdale.david)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
I would suggest that you withdraw the article until you are able to provide better documentation.
 
I would suggest that you withdraw the article until you are able to provide better documentation.
 +
:The source is the [[BAmerica does not want to know, you do. And the source is the [[Bible]]. Definitions for words? This isn't simply a dictionary, and if you find you need to keep consulting one you are perhaps overstretching your reading level. Messianic judaism - a problematic article..? Dictionary - book of word meanings - says: involving difficulties or problems; unsettled or posing an uncertain outcome> That applies exactly how? [[User:Fox|Fox]] 12:26, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:26, May 25, 2007

Tisdale.david

Pretty lame. No sources; no references; two of the four links are dead, and a third (messianic Judaism) goes to a problematic article.

America wants to know:

1. From what sources did you assemble the list?

2. What are the actual, useful, definitions for words such as "meanness".

3. How do you derive your "Code of Unrighteous Acts" subsets? Why, for example, is seduction "Robbery" rather than "Immorality"?

I would suggest that you withdraw the article until you are able to provide better documentation.

The source is the [[BAmerica does not want to know, you do. And the source is the Bible. Definitions for words? This isn't simply a dictionary, and if you find you need to keep consulting one you are perhaps overstretching your reading level. Messianic judaism - a problematic article..? Dictionary - book of word meanings - says: involving difficulties or problems; unsettled or posing an uncertain outcome> That applies exactly how? Fox 12:26, 25 May 2007 (EDT)