Difference between revisions of "Talk:Antichrist"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: Not my impression, it does seem to be written by someone who doesn't think that the anti-Christ is meant to be a literal person. That's a view that many Christians have. Still, the article could use some rewriting. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:41, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
 
: Not my impression, it does seem to be written by someone who doesn't think that the anti-Christ is meant to be a literal person. That's a view that many Christians have. Still, the article could use some rewriting. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:41, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Either that or a Preterist perspective, I should clarify. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:42, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:42, May 26, 2007

This article needs a complete rewrite; it appears to be possibly written from a non Christian standpoint. DanH 22:30, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

Not my impression, it does seem to be written by someone who doesn't think that the anti-Christ is meant to be a literal person. That's a view that many Christians have. Still, the article could use some rewriting. JoshuaZ 22:41, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

Either that or a Preterist perspective, I should clarify. DanH 22:42, 25 May 2007 (EDT)