Difference between revisions of "Talk:Democracy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nothing in the definition of democracy includes "liberal". Lets not get flustered just because democracy and democrat share the same linguistic root. Please feel free to expand the article if you would like to define "liberal democracy".[[User:PKBear|PKBear]] 00:55, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | Nothing in the definition of democracy includes "liberal". Lets not get flustered just because democracy and democrat share the same linguistic root. Please feel free to expand the article if you would like to define "liberal democracy".[[User:PKBear|PKBear]] 00:55, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
: Liberal democracy has nothing to do with the Democrats or left-wing politics. I think you're confusing the many meanings of the word 'liberal'. Here, it means the protection of civil liberties, the rights of minorities, freedom of speech etc. I've tried to clear that up in the article. --[[User:Rafa|Rafa]] 09:04, 25 March 2007 (EDT) | : Liberal democracy has nothing to do with the Democrats or left-wing politics. I think you're confusing the many meanings of the word 'liberal'. Here, it means the protection of civil liberties, the rights of minorities, freedom of speech etc. I've tried to clear that up in the article. --[[User:Rafa|Rafa]] 09:04, 25 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The update I made was entirely consistent with other conservapedia pages, ''and'' I cited my references (indeed, I suprisingly had to add the reference tag to the article...). Why was the change reverted? | ||
Revision as of 04:19, May 27, 2007
Nothing in the definition of democracy includes "liberal". Lets not get flustered just because democracy and democrat share the same linguistic root. Please feel free to expand the article if you would like to define "liberal democracy".PKBear 00:55, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Liberal democracy has nothing to do with the Democrats or left-wing politics. I think you're confusing the many meanings of the word 'liberal'. Here, it means the protection of civil liberties, the rights of minorities, freedom of speech etc. I've tried to clear that up in the article. --Rafa 09:04, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
The update I made was entirely consistent with other conservapedia pages, and I cited my references (indeed, I suprisingly had to add the reference tag to the article...). Why was the change reverted?