Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 bytes added ,  22:47, August 1, 2021
m
Line 231: Line 231:  
|style="background-color:lightblue"|'''''What? Why should this be true?''''' Mathematicians have not proofed yet that &pi; is a [[normal number]]! You can easily construct a irrational number which contains an approximation of &pi; of length 10<sup>10,000</sup>, but no approximation of length 10<sup>10,000</sup> + 1 . Perhaps God constructed &pi; this way - just to teach mathematicians a little humility. No one knows yet.
 
|style="background-color:lightblue"|'''''What? Why should this be true?''''' Mathematicians have not proofed yet that &pi; is a [[normal number]]! You can easily construct a irrational number which contains an approximation of &pi; of length 10<sup>10,000</sup>, but no approximation of length 10<sup>10,000</sup> + 1 . Perhaps God constructed &pi; this way - just to teach mathematicians a little humility. No one knows yet.
 
|-
 
|-
−
|style="background-color:lightblue"|But even if your conclusion was true, you would have proofed only that &pi; contains approximations of every imaginable '''''finite''''' length - not of '''''infinite length'''''. That the same principle which allows you to count to every number, but never reach infinity.
+
|style="background-color:lightblue"|But even if your conclusion was true, you would have proofed only that &pi; contains approximations of every imaginable '''''finite''''' length - not of '''''infinite length'''''. That is the same principle which allows you to count to every number, but never reach infinity.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="background-color:pink"|Q.E.D.
 
|style="background-color:pink"|Q.E.D.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu