Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ivermectin (view source)

Revision as of 01:49, August 2, 2021

695 bytes removed ,  01:49, August 2, 2021
→‎Efficacy Questioned: removed as most studies show its efficacy
Line 5: Line 5:  
“We kind of thought, well, there’s no negatives to taking this,” said [a COVID patient]. “It’s not going to have any really bad side effects. If it could help, why not?”
 
“We kind of thought, well, there’s no negatives to taking this,” said [a COVID patient]. “It’s not going to have any really bad side effects. If it could help, why not?”
 
Within 24 hours, her fever was gone. After two days, Coutts felt completely herself again.<ref>https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/ivermectintestimonials.html</ref>}}
 
Within 24 hours, her fever was gone. After two days, Coutts felt completely herself again.<ref>https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/ivermectintestimonials.html</ref>}}
−
  −
==Efficacy Questioned==
  −
The efficacy of a drug being promoted for treating Covid-19 is in serious doubt after a major study suggesting the treatment is effective against the virus was withdrawn due to “ethical concerns”. <ref>https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-100956/v4</ref>
  −
  −
The preprint study on the efficacy and safety of ivermectin – a drug used against parasites such as worms and headlice – in treating Covid-19, led by Dr Ahmed Elgazzar from Benha University in Egypt, was published on the Research Square website in November. <ref>https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/jul/16/huge-study-supporting-ivermectin-as-covid-treatment-withdrawn-over-ethical-concerns</ref>
      
==FDA Stance ==
 
==FDA Stance ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1784126"

Navigation menu