Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abstract algebra"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (added username)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Expanded this section - it's true that abstract algebra is a branch of mathematics, but it's more narrow than that.  Removed [[linear algebra]] as part of the definition.  I haven't seen linear algebra being defined as an algebraic structure.  There are matrix algebras that are algebraic structures, but "linear algebra" doesn't seem to fit.  I won't argue too much though about it if someone thinks it does belong because it is used in the abstract algebra context.([[AlChesapeake]][[User talk:AlChesapeake|talk]]) 20:10, September 6, 2021 (EDT)
+
Expanded this section - it's true that abstract algebra is a branch of mathematics, but it's more narrow than that.  Removed [[linear algebra]] as part of the definition.  I haven't seen linear algebra being defined as an algebraic structure.  There are matrix algebras that are algebraic structures, but "linear algebra" doesn't seem to fit.  I won't argue too much though about it if someone thinks it does belong because it is used in the abstract algebra context.[[User:AlChesapeake|AlChesapeake]]([[User talk:AlChesapeake|talk]]) 20:10, September 6, 2021 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 00:13, September 7, 2021

Expanded this section - it's true that abstract algebra is a branch of mathematics, but it's more narrow than that. Removed linear algebra as part of the definition. I haven't seen linear algebra being defined as an algebraic structure. There are matrix algebras that are algebraic structures, but "linear algebra" doesn't seem to fit. I won't argue too much though about it if someone thinks it does belong because it is used in the abstract algebra context.AlChesapeake(talk) 20:10, September 6, 2021 (EDT)