Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Concise article"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Avoid redirect)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A '''concise article''', like this one, expresses much in few words.<ref>[http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=concise Concise]</ref>
 
A '''concise article''', like this one, expresses much in few words.<ref>[http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=concise Concise]</ref>
  
−
Like a true encyclopedia conciseness is encouraged [[Main Page|here]]. [[Wikipedia]] implicitly encourages (through its use of [[stub]]s) long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential [[fact]]s.<ref>[[Conservapedia:Differences with Wikipedia]]</ref>  
+
Like a true encyclopedia conciseness is encouraged [[Main Page|here]]. [[Wikipedia]] implicitly encourages (through its use of [[stub]]s) long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential [[fact]]s.<ref>[[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]]</ref>  
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 16:07, May 28, 2007

A concise article, like this one, expresses much in few words.[1]

Like a true encyclopedia conciseness is encouraged here. Wikipedia implicitly encourages (through its use of stubs) long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential facts.[2]

References