Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Concise article"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Avoid redirect) |
(More accurate wording) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''concise article''', like this one, expresses much in few words.<ref>[http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=concise Concise]</ref> | A '''concise article''', like this one, expresses much in few words.<ref>[http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=concise Concise]</ref> | ||
| − | Like a true encyclopedia conciseness is encouraged [[Main Page|here]]. [[Wikipedia]] implicitly encourages (through its use of [[stub]]s) long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential [[fact]]s.<ref>[[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]]</ref> | + | Like a true encyclopedia conciseness is encouraged [[Main Page|here]]. [[Wikipedia]] implicitly encourages (through its use of marking short articles as "[[stub]]s") long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential [[fact]]s.<ref>[[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]]</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:07, May 28, 2007
A concise article, like this one, expresses much in few words.[1]
Like a true encyclopedia conciseness is encouraged here. Wikipedia implicitly encourages (through its use of marking short articles as "stubs") long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential facts.[2]