Difference between revisions of "User talk:Learn together"
ThunderBunny (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
The atheism article is better as you have it. The agnostic stat is not going to be included, and the citation is not needed.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] <sup>[[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]]</sup> 19:47, 23 May 2007 (EDT) | The atheism article is better as you have it. The agnostic stat is not going to be included, and the citation is not needed.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] <sup>[[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]]</sup> 19:47, 23 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
::Your quality contributions to this site and especially the history articles have earned you a place in the highly coveted and extremely prestigious "Bohdan's notable Users" category. Keep up the good work.[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] <sup>[[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]]</sup> 23:07, 26 May 2007 (EDT) | ::Your quality contributions to this site and especially the history articles have earned you a place in the highly coveted and extremely prestigious "Bohdan's notable Users" category. Keep up the good work.[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] <sup>[[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]]</sup> 23:07, 26 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Atheism == | ||
| + | |||
| + | What's the problem with my edit to the [[atheism]] page? --[[User:ThunderBunny|ThunderBunny]] 22:51, 28 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:51, May 29, 2007
Hey there, Learn together. I noticed that you added a {{speedy template to Essay:Creationist Behavior on Conservapedia. I removed it, and as a courtesy, would like to let you know that nominating any article for deletion requires an explanation as to why you think it should be deleted (see Category:Speedy deletion candidates or Conservapedia:Articles for Deletion), and an AFD template certainly would have been more appropriate. Tagging established articles in the "Essay:" namespace without justification is frowned upon. And by the way, thanks for your contributions to Roman Empire! --Hojimachongtalk 20:18, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Note that Essay:Creationist Behavior on Conservapedia has the prefix "Essay:", noting that it is not an encyclopedia article, but rather an unofficial essay. And it was authorized as a response to Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia (yes, liberals are just as prolific as creationists here, and make most of the useful edits :P). --Hojimachongtalk 01:18, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Welcome!
Hello, Learn together, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Learn together!
--Sysop-TK /MyTalk 04:51, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Clinton Revert....
I jumped in since Dan was headed to bed, and tried to answer some of your questions, here: [[1]] --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 04:58, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
- Sometimes it does seem as if they are instantly checked! It had me puzzled for a bit as well. What happens is, many regular users have a window opened here [[2]] to "Recent Changes" and refresh it periodically. Also, from your "Preferences" you can enable "Watch this Page" and set a limit even on how many. Then whatever page you edit, or manually choose to "watch" will show up in your Watch List. Since Dan had previously edited the Clinton page, it was on his, undoubtedly. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 14:15, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Good Job
Thank you for your excellent edits. Keep up the good work! DanH 15:09, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Jesus
Fantastic work on the Jesus Christ article! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 17:00, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Saint Andrew
Fine. It is done now.
I agree to do that. If I did redirect it was because "Ian St John 11:48, 13 May 2007 (EDT)" complain about Andrew and Philip along. I have the intention to make the six articles that are left to complete the 12 Apostles. Next time the name will be for example: "Bartholomew the Apostle".
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 18:15, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
Highlighting Links
Hi
Thanks for your comment. I knew that and it's logic. For sure I agree with it. Could be a mistake if there is one or two made by me.
Have you fixed them or do you want me to search?
--User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 08:38, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
Atheism
Just wanted to be clear that I was agreeing with you. Not sure if you were responding to me or GodWarrior when you wrote this. HeartOfGold 14:59, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
My pleasure
It has been an honor. Thank you indeed.
Edit summaries
I appreciate this edit, and concur. While I also neglect make edit summaries, I want to encourage you to make use of the edit summary box. This probably sounds like the pot calling the kettle black, but I assure you that I do endeavor to follow this advice, and I encourage you to do the same. It makes reviewing edit histories of articles easier. Thanks for contributing. HeartOfGoldtalk 01:22, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Compliment
Excellent work on the Rather article.Bohdan Talk 12:58, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Global Warming, et.al.
You might want to consider this [[3]] when making larger changes to articles. Not that I am disagreeing with your additions to the "Warming" article. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 18:19, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Request
Could you improve my pathetic excuse-of-an-article on Justinian? It seems he is someone you would know much about.Bohdan Talk 18:21, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Sorry!
You got caught up in the removal of some other stuff! --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 21:27, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
I agree with you
The atheism article is better as you have it. The agnostic stat is not going to be included, and the citation is not needed.Bohdan Talk 19:47, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
Atheism
What's the problem with my edit to the atheism page? --ThunderBunny 22:51, 28 May 2007 (EDT)