Changes

Unlike RationalWikians, I am able to be more objective. I am far more able to look at issues outside an ideological box.  

Unlike RationalWikians, I am able to be more objective. I am far more able to look at issues outside an ideological box.  

[[Image:Staunton chess set.jpg|right|thumb|300px|A person with a Chess ELO score is considered an expert.]]

[[Image:Staunton chess set.jpg|right|thumb|300px|A person with a Chess ELO score of 2100 is considered an expert.]]

Cognitive flexibility is the ability to adapt our behaviour and thinking in response to the environment. When people are asked to think about multiple concepts simultaneously or change their approach to solving a problem, they need to demonstrate flexible thinking.  At RationalWiki, there is not a lot of cognitive flexibility.<ref>[https://www.foothillsacademy.org/community-services/parent-education/parent-articles/cognitive-flexibility#:~:text=Cognitive%20flexibility%20is%20the%20ability,need%20to%20demonstrate%20flexible%20thinking. What Is Cognitive Flexibility and How Do I Help My Child With It?]</ref>

Cognitive flexibility is the ability to adapt our behaviour and thinking in response to the environment. When people are asked to think about multiple concepts simultaneously or change their approach to solving a problem, they need to demonstrate flexible thinking.  At RationalWiki, there is not a lot of cognitive flexibility.<ref>[https://www.foothillsacademy.org/community-services/parent-education/parent-articles/cognitive-flexibility#:~:text=Cognitive%20flexibility%20is%20the%20ability,need%20to%20demonstrate%20flexible%20thinking. What Is Cognitive Flexibility and How Do I Help My Child With It?]</ref>

1) I cite: A RationalWiki editor whose username is Christopher wrote at RationalWiki: "Technically...[User: Conservative at Conservapedia].. "shouldn’t have been banned, the vote to ban him was one short of the 2/3 majority that’s needed according to site policy."[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=prev&oldid=2296799]

1) I cite: A RationalWiki editor whose username is Christopher wrote at RationalWiki: "Technically...[User: Conservative at Conservapedia].. "shouldn’t have been banned, the vote to ban him was one short of the 2/3 majority that’s needed according to site policy."[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=prev&oldid=2296799]

In short, RationalWiki broke its own rules when they permabaned me. According to RationalWiki rules, a permaban requires a 66% majority. RationalWiki permabanned me without such a majority.   

In short, RationalWiki broke its own rules when they permabanned me. According to RationalWiki rules, a permaban requires a 66% majority. RationalWiki permabanned me without such a majority.   

But their so-called permaban means nothing. I have several sock puppet accounts there now. If I want an account to be banned there, it is not. On the other hand, I know full well that if I stray outside the secular liberal/leftist bubble at RationalWiki, I get into a very high risk of being banned. The farther politically right I go, the higher the risk of being banned.   

But their so-called permaban means nothing. I have several sock puppet accounts there now. If I want an account to be banned there, it is not. On the other hand, I know full well that if I stray outside the secular liberal/leftist bubble at RationalWiki, I get into a very high risk of being banned. The farther politically right I go, the higher the risk of being banned.