Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,880
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: − +
Essay: The Conservapedia atheism article is currently receiving about 11,110 page views a month. And it is merely one of the 1,900+ atheism related articles at Conservapedia. (view source)
Revision as of 02:37, December 21, 2021
, 02:37, December 21, 2021→Conservapedia vs. Richard Dawkins and his website
''See also:'' [[Richard Dawkins and women]]
''See also:'' [[Richard Dawkins and women]]
[[File:Rebecca-watson.jpg|center|thumbnail|150px|[[Rebecca Watson]] is the [[atheist feminism|atheist feminist]] who fought with Richard Dawkins during the [[Elevatorgate]] scandal. ]]
Prior to the [[Elevatorgate]] scandal, which was a scandal involving the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] vs. feminists, [[Monica Shores]]' ''Ms. Magazine'' article titled ''Will “[[New Atheism]]” Make Room For Women?'' criticized the News Atheism movement for being [[sexism|sexist]].<ref name="msmagazine.com">[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine'', 2010</ref> She also cited [[Conservapedia]] in her article and indicated: "The lack of lady presence is so visible that Conservapedia commented on it by noting that [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website|Dawkins’ website]] overwhelmingly attracts male visitors."<ref name="msmagazine.com"/>
Prior to the [[Elevatorgate]] scandal, which was a scandal involving the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] vs. feminists, [[Monica Shores]]' ''Ms. Magazine'' article titled ''Will “[[New Atheism]]” Make Room For Women?'' criticized the News Atheism movement for being [[sexism|sexist]].<ref name="msmagazine.com">[http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/11/01/will-new-atheism-make-room-for-women/ ''Will “New Atheism” Make Room For Women''] by Monica Shores, ''Ms. Magazine'', 2010</ref> She also cited [[Conservapedia]] in her article and indicated: "The lack of lady presence is so visible that Conservapedia commented on it by noting that [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science website|Dawkins’ website]] overwhelmingly attracts male visitors."<ref name="msmagazine.com"/>