SkipCaptcha
126
edits
Changes
→Corollary: No three lines with prime numbers as lengths can form a right triangle: added back hypothesis
That is, it is to be proven that the first proposition (that is, the proposition that is the simple assumption, the ''assumption for a conditional proof'') leads to the second.
That is, it is to be proven that the first proposition (that is, the proposition that is the simple assumption, the ''assumption for a conditional proof'') leads to the second.
===Third hypothesis===
:Second simple assumption: One or more sets of ''two'' natural numbers, a pair ''n''<sub>1</sub> and ''n''<sub>2</sub>, for example, exist that have a positive integral factor ''f'' apart from one and themselves and common to both of them.
:Corollary to assumption: Through the definition of prime numbers such as described in the first "conceptualization" section, if any pair of positive integers ''n''<sub>1</sub> and ''n''<sub>2</sub> have an common integral factor ''f'' apart from one and themselves, they are not prime because they ''both'' have a non-prime type of positive integral factor; in fact it's the same one.
===Conceptualization (cont'd)===
===Conceptualization (cont'd)===