Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + +
→Could more have been saved?: The conclusion of that report is somewhat sympathetic to the delinquency of the ''SS Californian'', stating it could not have plausibly arrived before the Titanic sank.
== Could more have been saved? ==
== Could more have been saved? ==
"The first rocket appears to have been fired at about 0045 hrs (TITANIC time). The ship sank at about 0220 hrs."<ref>https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/54c15bf240f0b6158d000027/MAIBReport_ReappraisalOfEvidence-SSCalifornian-Titanic-1992.pdf</ref> So states a renewed [[British]] official maritime analysis in 1992 into the culpability of the ''SS Californian'' cruise ship in not helping with the rescue, despite being nearby. The conclusion of that report is somewhat sympathetic to the delinquency of the ''SS Californian'', stating it could not have plausibly arrived before the Titanic sank.
== See also ==
== See also ==
*[https://www.history.com/news/5-things-you-may-not-know-about-titanics-rescue-ship Interesting facts about the rescue]
*[https://www.history.com/news/5-things-you-may-not-know-about-titanics-rescue-ship Interesting facts about the rescue]
[[category:history]]
[[category:history]]