Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
155 bytes added ,  01:12, March 9, 2022
m
Line 38: Line 38:     
== Later editions ==
 
== Later editions ==
In 1550, Stephanus produced a beautifully printed edition that added footnotes containing text from the Bezae and Regius codices. This is considered the classic edition of TR and is referred to as ''Editio Regia''. In 1551, Stephanus added a verse numbering system that is still used in modern Bibles. As for the text itself, Stephanus did little to improve on what Erasmus published.
+
In 1550, Stephanus produced a beautifully printed edition that added footnotes containing text from the Bezae and Regius codices. This edition was called ''Editio Regia''. In 1551, Stephanus added a verse numbering system that is still used in modern Bibles. For the Greek text, Stephanus consulted the later editions of TR by Erasmus.
   −
The KJV translators consulted a 1598 reprint of ''Edito Regia'' by Theodore Beza as well as several other editions. The ''Scrivener New Testament'' (1894) reconstructs the underlying Greek text they used. Scrivener found only 190 verses where KJV did not correspond to Beza text.<ref name="Greek"/>
+
The KJV translators used a 1598 reprint of ''Edito Regia'' by Beza. The ''Scrivener New Testament'' (1894) reconstructs the underlying Greek text they used. This is the most commonly used version of TR in modern times. Scrivener found only 190 verses where KJV did not correspond to Beza text.<ref name="Greek"/>
   −
In 1720, Richard Bentley proposed that TR be replaced with a Greek text based on ''Alexandrinus''.<ref>Bentley, Richard, ''Proposals for a New Edition of the Greek Testament'', 1720.</ref> In the early 19th century, Karl Lachmann developed a methodology which allowed a critic to determine which manuscript variants are likely to be closer to the original. He assigned manuscripts to various text types. In 1850, he published a Greek New Testament based on manuscripts of the Alexandrian type. In 1881, B.F. Westcott and  F.J.A. Hort published a critical text based on ''[[Codex Sinaiticus]]'', ''[[Codex Vaticanus]]'', a manuscript in the Vatican Library, and ''Alexandrinus.''
+
In 1720, Richard Bentley proposed that TR be replaced with a Greek text based on ''Alexandrinus''.<ref>Bentley, Richard, ''Proposals for a New Edition of the Greek Testament'', 1720.</ref> This manuscript had been given to King [[Charles I]] of England in 1621 by Patriarch Cyril Lucaris.
 +
 
 +
In the early 19th century, Karl Lachmann developed a methodology which allowed a critic to determine which manuscript variants are likely to be closer to the original. He assigned manuscripts to various text types. In 1850, Lachmann published a Greek New Testament based on ''Alexandrinius'' and other manuscripts. This was the first major challenge to the dominance of TR as a biblical text.
 +
 
 +
In 1881, B.F. Westcott and  F.J.A. Hort published a critical text based on ''[[Codex Sinaiticus]]'', ''[[Codex Vaticanus]]'', a manuscript in the Vatican Library, and ''Alexandrinus.''
    
Among modern translations, the [[New King James Version]] uses TR, while the [[New International Version]], the [[New American Standard Bible]], [[New Revised Standard Version]], and the [[English Standard Version]] use the Critical Text.
 
Among modern translations, the [[New King James Version]] uses TR, while the [[New International Version]], the [[New American Standard Bible]], [[New Revised Standard Version]], and the [[English Standard Version]] use the Critical Text.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
14,282

edits

Navigation menu