Difference between revisions of "Talk:Herodotus"
(No such person as Andflef) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I missed the "clear liberal bias" in the Wikipedia article. Perhaps, you could show me exactly where the "liberal bias" is. | I missed the "clear liberal bias" in the Wikipedia article. Perhaps, you could show me exactly where the "liberal bias" is. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[ANDFLEF?]] Don't you think that we ought to deal with the imaginary Andflef, who Herodotus married 18 years before he was born? | ||
| + | [[User:Tisdale.david|Tisdale.david]] 17:33, 3 June 2007 (EDT)tisdale.david | ||
Revision as of 21:33, June 3, 2007
Totally inadequate entry
- This is actually quite a large and detailed entry, by present standards hereabouts. It needs a bit of work, certainly, but not as much as many. And thousands of important people and things don't yet have an entry at all. Might I enquire if you personally are planning to do anything about this situation? --Jeremiah4-22 16:55, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Only if the powers that be at Conservapedia.org are serious about having a complete encyclopedia. Is one line plus a quote from the post office sufficient for the "father of history"?
So fix it, User:Oldoligarch. I don't see what's stopping you. Dpbsmith 12:21, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
If you want to see what a good article on Herodotus is go to wikipedia.org. The one here is Mickey Mouse level.
- So fix it, User:Oldoligarch. I don't see what's stopping you. Dpbsmith 14:05, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
The Wikipedia article on Herodotus has a clear liberal bias. It's your decision whether you're willing to put up with that sort of thing or not... --Jeremiah4-22 14:29, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
I missed the "clear liberal bias" in the Wikipedia article. Perhaps, you could show me exactly where the "liberal bias" is.
- ANDFLEF? Don't you think that we ought to deal with the imaginary Andflef, who Herodotus married 18 years before he was born?
Tisdale.david 17:33, 3 June 2007 (EDT)tisdale.david