Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
→Why…
The page [[Sharks]] should be removed and redirected to here. --[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 19:22, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
This article is full of misinformation, probably written by a vandal. I came across a blank page for [[sharks]] in which I created a stub. Perhaps this should be used for the basis of a better article?
This article is full of misinformation, probably written by a vandal. I came across a blank page for [[sharks]] in which I created a stub. Perhaps this should be used for the basis of a better article?
These are substantially similar. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:36, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
These are substantially similar. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:36, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
All of it has to be corrected...I think this vandal liked the kangaroo so much he thought he'd imitate! [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:17, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
"aerodynamic" should be corrected, unless sharks start taking flight...THanks
[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 11:12, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
:That caught my eye, too. I believe a better word is "streamlined". [[User:Human|Human]] 20:54, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
==I blanked the page==
I'm sure myself and others would correct it later, but all that wrong info just couldn't be allowed to stand. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:03, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
:ok...restored and better. People here work rather quickly! [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:06, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
::Vandalized again (the mammal thing); reverted to pre-mammalian version again. [[User:Human|Human]] 20:54, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
== Why… ==
Has this article been picked by every creationist as a place to push their viewpoint in a censorious manner? --[[User:TheGoldenRatio|TheGoldenRatio]] 22:37, 3 June 2007 (EDT)
:Is Conservapedia a place where every evolutionist can push their viewpoint regardless? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:39, 3 June 2007 (EDT)