Changes

*Al Odah v. United States, 559 F.3d 539 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (distinguished this precedent re: appealability of order granting access by a defendant to documents)

*Al Odah v. United States, 559 F.3d 539 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (distinguished this precedent re: appealability of order granting access by a defendant to documents)

*Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 424 F.3d 1117 (11th Cir. 2005) (affirming a ruling by the [[Eleventh Circuit]] that it lacked jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal of an order concerning attorney-client privilege)  

*Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 424 F.3d 1117 (11th Cir. 2005) (affirming a ruling by the [[Eleventh Circuit]] that it lacked jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal of an order concerning attorney-client privilege)  

*Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. Stidham, 640 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2011)

*Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. Stidham, 640 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2011) (Injunction Order is not “inextricably intertwined” with the appointment of the Special Master and thus was not appealable)

*Lyons v. PNC Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 26 F.4th 180 (4th Cir. 2022)

*Lyons v. PNC Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 26 F.4th 180 (4th Cir. 2022)

*''[[Mohawk Indus. v. Carpenter]]'', 558 U.S. 100 (2009)

*''[[Mohawk Indus. v. Carpenter]]'', 558 U.S. 100 (2009)