Difference between revisions of "Talk:Red state"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Is there a reason to not have a 'See Also' section?  Red State and Blue State are intrinsically related terms.  It makes sense to connect them.
 
Is there a reason to not have a 'See Also' section?  Red State and Blue State are intrinsically related terms.  It makes sense to connect them.
 
--[[User:Brainwalker|Brainwalker]] 02:30, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
 
--[[User:Brainwalker|Brainwalker]] 02:30, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I have to say that I suspect that a lot of this article is an oversimplification. We cannot make an oversimplifying statement that voters in a state tend one direction when 52% of a state vote Republican (the information here would hardly apply to Ohio, for instance.) [[User:DanH|DanH]] 10:14, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:14, June 5, 2007

RobS- Is there a reason to not have a 'See Also' section? Red State and Blue State are intrinsically related terms. It makes sense to connect them. --Brainwalker 02:30, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

I have to say that I suspect that a lot of this article is an oversimplification. We cannot make an oversimplifying statement that voters in a state tend one direction when 52% of a state vote Republican (the information here would hardly apply to Ohio, for instance.) DanH 10:14, 5 June 2007 (EDT)