Difference between revisions of "Talk:Red state"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
--[[User:Brainwalker|Brainwalker]] 02:30, 20 May 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:Brainwalker|Brainwalker]] 02:30, 20 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | I have to say that I suspect that a lot of this article is an oversimplification. We cannot make an oversimplifying statement that voters in a state tend one direction when 52% of a state vote Republican (the information here would hardly apply to Ohio, for instance.) [[User:DanH|DanH]] 10:14, 5 June 2007 (EDT) | + | I have to say that I suspect that a lot of this article is an oversimplification. We cannot make an oversimplifying statement that voters in a state tend one direction when 52% of a state vote Republican (the information here would hardly apply to Ohio, for instance.) The same goes for some states that would be "blue". For instance, Illinois votes Democrat in elections because of Chicago, but there are many conservative voters in the Southern part. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 10:14, 5 June 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 14:15, June 5, 2007
RobS- Is there a reason to not have a 'See Also' section? Red State and Blue State are intrinsically related terms. It makes sense to connect them. --Brainwalker 02:30, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
I have to say that I suspect that a lot of this article is an oversimplification. We cannot make an oversimplifying statement that voters in a state tend one direction when 52% of a state vote Republican (the information here would hardly apply to Ohio, for instance.) The same goes for some states that would be "blue". For instance, Illinois votes Democrat in elections because of Chicago, but there are many conservative voters in the Southern part. DanH 10:14, 5 June 2007 (EDT)