Changes

[[File:Eads Bridge.jpg|right|300px|Thumb|Eads Bridge]]In ''United States v. Terminal R. Ass'n'', 224 U.S. 383 (1912), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled against an association that monopolized the [[James Eads|Eads Bridge]] and associated terminal in [[St. Louis]]:

[[File:Eads Bridge.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Eads Bridge]]In ''United States v. Terminal R. Ass'n'', 224 U.S. 383 (1912), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled against an association that monopolized the [[James Eads|Eads Bridge]] and associated terminal in [[St. Louis]]:

<blockquote>But when, as here, the inherent conditions are such as to prohibit any other reasonable means of entering the city, the combination of every such facility under the exclusive ownership and control of less than all of the companies under compulsion to use them violates both the first and second sections of the act, in that it constitutes a contract or combination in restraint of commerce among the States and an attempt to monopolize commerce among the States which must pass through the gateway at St. Louis.

<blockquote>But when, as here, the inherent conditions are such as to prohibit any other reasonable means of entering the city, the combination of every such facility under the exclusive ownership and control of less than all of the companies under compulsion to use them violates both the first and second sections of the act, in that it constitutes a contract or combination in restraint of commerce among the States and an attempt to monopolize commerce among the States which must pass through the gateway at St. Louis.