Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Speech or Debate Clause (view source)

Revision as of 19:16, March 19, 2023

390 bytes added ,  19:16, March 19, 2023
no edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:  
{{cquote|... the Speech or Debate Clause bars this suit. The Court concludes that it does, and it therefore dismisses Meadows's claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.}}
 
{{cquote|... the Speech or Debate Clause bars this suit. The Court concludes that it does, and it therefore dismisses Meadows's claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.}}
 
''Meadows v. Pelosi'', Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-03217 (CJN), 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198129, at *3 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2022).
 
''Meadows v. Pelosi'', Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-03217 (CJN), 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198129, at *3 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2022).
 +
== Grand jury ==
 +
{{cquote|In summary, for the purpose of our jurisdictional analysis, we conclude that at least under some circumstances the Speech or Debate Clause prohibits not only reference to protected material on the face of an indictment but also the use of that material before the grand jury.}}
 +
''United States v. Rostenkowski'', 313 U.S. App. D.C. 303, 59 F.3d 1291, 1300 (1995).
 
[[Category:Speech or Debate Clause]]
 
[[Category:Speech or Debate Clause]]
 
[[Category:United States Congress]]
 
[[Category:United States Congress]]
 
[[Category:United States Constitution]]
 
[[Category:United States Constitution]]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,519

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1939310"

Navigation menu