Difference between revisions of "Talk:Political Profiling"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
:Are you alleging Andy has cyberstalked, harrassed, and publicly defamed an individual with guilt by association smears, alleging someone holds partisan, extreme, or racist views that the person in reality does not?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:16, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:Are you alleging Andy has cyberstalked, harrassed, and publicly defamed an individual with guilt by association smears, alleging someone holds partisan, extreme, or racist views that the person in reality does not?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:16, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
 
+
::I make no allegation about Andy cyberstalking.  I just have trouble understanding your article.  Either it is a bit obscure, or I am dense, or both.[[User:Associate|Associate]] 11:09, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
 
==More evidence==
 
==More evidence==
 
*Theis article was create on March 16 2007,[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christian_terrorism&diff=83432&oldid=42538] [[Christian terrorism]], extracted,
 
*Theis article was create on March 16 2007,[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christian_terrorism&diff=83432&oldid=42538] [[Christian terrorism]], extracted,

Revision as of 15:09, June 11, 2007

"A internet user's postings under either their real life identity of pseudonym may be "profiled" for their ideological convictions based upon editing patterns, interests, subject matter, common references, or declared beliefs. The profile is then pigeon-holed into predetermined character assessments..."

"James, please disclose your political point-of-view along with that of the "scholar". Let me guess: do both of you oppose prayer in the classrooms of public schools? Enough said.--Aschlafly 13:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)"

Is the above related to what you are saying? Because I am not sure I understand your article.Associate 23:05, 10 June 2007 (EDT)

Are you alleging Andy has cyberstalked, harrassed, and publicly defamed an individual with guilt by association smears, alleging someone holds partisan, extreme, or racist views that the person in reality does not? RobS 23:16, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
I make no allegation about Andy cyberstalking. I just have trouble understanding your article. Either it is a bit obscure, or I am dense, or both.Associate 11:09, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

More evidence

Many frequently-cited examples of "Christian terrorism" are more closely tied to racist ideology promoting white supremacy, such as the Ku Klux Klan. Other groups, such as the Christian Identity movement bridge the gap between racism and religious extremism.

Review the sourcing, [2]

Religion and the Racist Right: The Origins of the Christian Identity Movement University of N. Carolina Press ISBN 978-0807846384

Chip Berlet 2004 http://www.publiceye.org/rightist/idennlns.html A New Face for Racism & Fascism |work = White Supremacist, Antisemitic, and Race Hate Groups in the U.S.: A Geneology Political Research Associates.

This is evidence Conservapedia has been the target of politcal profiling since 16 March. RobS 00:13, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

  • Also, the linking of certain off-color articles and topics, through Google search, is yet another form of poisoning the well.--Sysop-TK /MyTalk 00:24, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
Im not sure what point Rob is making about Christian Identity, but they are self-avowedly racist. They certainly consider themselves Christian, although it would be easy to argue that their beliefs have little to do with Jesus.Associate 01:45, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
Throughout history, there are countless men and women who have called themselves Christians, but their actions state otherwise. Karajou 01:49, 11 June 2007 (EDT)