Changes

Talk:Paxton Impeachment (view source)

Revision as of 23:45, July 2, 2023

456 bytes added , 23:45, July 2, 2023

Abbott plays very petty politics with a ruthless vengeance, as illustrated merely a few weeks later when he vetoed a record number of bills enacted by his party, many unanimously, simply based on who had sponsored them.

Line 4: Line 4:

Oh and if Abbott's incentive is to destroy Paxton, why did he replace him with someone who is doing the same thing? I'm from DFW -- and actually attend the same church where Paxton claims to be a member -- and his dirty deeds are well-known. Shouldn't we try to clean our own house? Or is it OK to ignore corruption on our side, on the basis that "well, Democrats would ignore it"? [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 18:37, July 2, 2023 (EDT)

+

:The reason is obvious: Trump-endorsed Paxton is a strong rival to Abbott's reelection in 2026, when Abbott will not have Trump's endorsement. Abbott plays very petty politics with a ruthless vengeance, as illustrated merely a few weeks later when he vetoed a record number of bills enacted by his party, many unanimously, simply based on who had sponsored them.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 19:45, July 2, 2023 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,204

edits