Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alvaro Uribe"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:If you want it to have a chance to stick, you'll have to write it better. Your first source is the one that Rob already determined is inadequate, so as soon as he sees that, you'll be reverted. You make references to sources that you don't use with references; that will also draw a red flag. You must have very specific articles with very specific references. I hope this helps. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:27, 13 June 2007 (EDT) | :If you want it to have a chance to stick, you'll have to write it better. Your first source is the one that Rob already determined is inadequate, so as soon as he sees that, you'll be reverted. You make references to sources that you don't use with references; that will also draw a red flag. You must have very specific articles with very specific references. I hope this helps. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:27, 13 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah you're probably right it won't stick, the facts have too much of a liberal bias --[[User:FreedomandLiberty|FreedomandLiberty]] 11:33, 13 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:33, June 13, 2007
How do we determine he is a dictator? The only information provided in the article discusses a Presidential election and receiving 62% of the vote and the word dictator is never used. Now of course dictators can have "elections" as well, but they are usually the only candidate running and results of 99+% are customary.
Thanks Learn together 11:22, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
Human Rights Abuses
Uribe and his government have been linked to human rights abuses. This has been reported in the mainstream media. Way to whitewash the facts just because they don't fit your ideology --FreedomandLiberty 11:01, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
- Then you will have to have a source from mainstream media. Rob has already determined the listed source is not adequate. Learn together 11:02, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
- Would this be mainstream enough? Amnesty's fairly prestigious. --wikinterpreter woo!
Thank you Wikinterpreter --FreedomandLiberty 11:07, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
- If you want it to have a chance to stick, you'll have to write it better. Your first source is the one that Rob already determined is inadequate, so as soon as he sees that, you'll be reverted. You make references to sources that you don't use with references; that will also draw a red flag. You must have very specific articles with very specific references. I hope this helps. Learn together 11:27, 13 June 2007 (EDT)
Yeah you're probably right it won't stick, the facts have too much of a liberal bias --FreedomandLiberty 11:33, 13 June 2007 (EDT)