Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creation and evolution compared"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Table width: Not needed)
(Be encyclopedic)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Can the table width be set to something static?  Like 10% topic, 45% creation, 45% evolution?  If it changes topic by topic it might look ugly.  I'll look up wiki coding when I get home.-[[User:Phoenix|Phoenix]] 09:03, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
 
Can the table width be set to something static?  Like 10% topic, 45% creation, 45% evolution?  If it changes topic by topic it might look ugly.  I'll look up wiki coding when I get home.-[[User:Phoenix|Phoenix]] 09:03, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:The column widths can be fixed, but as long as it is one table with multiple rows and not multiple tables, it won't change topic by topic.  I'd suggest leaving it as it is for now at least, and see how it goes.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:08, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:The column widths can be fixed, but as long as it is one table with multiple rows and not multiple tables, it won't change topic by topic.  I'd suggest leaving it as it is for now at least, and see how it goes.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:08, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Be encyclopedic ==
 +
 +
I realise that it's early <s>days</s> ''minutes'' so far, so I won't change anything just yet, but keep in mind that this should be encyclopedic, not argumentative.  You are describing different views, not preaching one view over another. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:12, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:12, June 14, 2007

Looks good. This needs, of course, close monitoring. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 08:15, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

Table width

Can the table width be set to something static? Like 10% topic, 45% creation, 45% evolution? If it changes topic by topic it might look ugly. I'll look up wiki coding when I get home.-Phoenix 09:03, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

The column widths can be fixed, but as long as it is one table with multiple rows and not multiple tables, it won't change topic by topic. I'd suggest leaving it as it is for now at least, and see how it goes. Philip J. Rayment 09:08, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

Be encyclopedic

I realise that it's early days minutes so far, so I won't change anything just yet, but keep in mind that this should be encyclopedic, not argumentative. You are describing different views, not preaching one view over another. Philip J. Rayment 09:12, 14 June 2007 (EDT)