Difference between revisions of "User talk:DanH"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Image)
(Replacing page with '<big><big>'''You slutty man whore!'''</big></big>')
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Archives:'''
+
<big><big>'''You slutty man whore!'''</big></big>
−
 
 
−
[[User talk:MountainDew]]
 
−
 
 
−
[[User talk:DanHarchive1]]
 
−
 
 
−
==Vandalism==
 
−
 
 
−
Dan,
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks for all your help dealing with this latest vandal.  Rather than deleting all the pages he creates, I have been replacing them with content or redirecting them, and then protecting them.  Eventually, we can hope he will run out of inventive names for Satan! ~ <font color="Navy">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]</font><font color="Turquoise"> <sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 16:38, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== [[deletedpage]] ==
 
−
 
 
−
when pages need to be deleted and protected, just protect it and replace the content with <nowiki>#REDIRECT [[deletedpage]]</nowiki>.  that way it doesn't show up on searches. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 12:24, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Please take a look at this edit ==
 
−
 
 
−
You might want to have a look at this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Che_Guevara&diff=160970&oldid=160909 edit], and the associated photo that was uploaded to make the edit possible.  I've already left a message with the user responsible for the photo and edit, but am not sure if it is revertable.  [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 18:41, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Allegation of Racism==
 
−
 
 
−
I fail to see how my comments on Sikhs are racist.  Islam and Sikhism do not describe races they describe religion.  Both are wrong in my opinion are to be condemed
 
−
 
 
−
== Thank you indeed ==
 
−
 
 
−
 
−
It has been an honor. Thank you indeed.
 
−
 
 
−
--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 19:42, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Deceit Entry ==
 
−
 
 
−
Dan, please accept my apologies on the Ward Churchill edit to the [[deceit]] entry.  I was confused about who he is.  Feel free to reinsert something, with support like this: [http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_3841949,00.html]
 
−
--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:08, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
No need to apologize. I just figured that this instance was not quite conducive to the direct you had intended for this article. I'll re-add it a little later this evening. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:29, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Hovind ==
 
−
 
 
−
May I ask why you removed "controversial". Given that many other YECs also have issues with him, calling him controversial seems fair. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 12:59, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
I've come under attack for my edits on this article (there was even a call for me to be blocked from the site, though it's not on any CP talk pages) and I was trying to "balance" the article somehow. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:02, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== notice ==
 
−
 
 
−
please read this: [[New Sysops Training Page]]
 
−
 
 
−
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:22, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Hello! ==
 
−
 
 
−
First of all, thanks for the greeting. This project is very interessting. I'm trying to build up a counter-Wikipedia in german language. The situation of the german Wikipedia is really dire. If you are dissapoited by the english language Wikipeda, take a closer look at the german one. There are not liberals (left) dominating, there are partly well known left-wing extremists (communists, socialists) serving as administrators. It's bad. --[[User:Deutscher|Deutscher]] 16:43, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Trashbat ==
 
−
Dan - I've no idea if Trashbat is blocked or otherwise in disgrace but the crude sexual reference you removed from [[Leeds]] was not posted by him but by Tony Drago.  FYI.  [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 14:44, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
: I stand corrected. Well spotted. Tony Drago must have been a sock. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 14:49, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
*I don't see Dan online, however I did see: ''10:13, 20 May 2007 DanH blocked "Trashbat" with an expiry time of infinite ("dogging" reference to Leeds)''  So the two users being blocked are different instances. The other user's block isn't infinte. ;-)  --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 14:51, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:TK The "dogging" reference was put in twice but I only noticed the second edit which was done by Tony Drago. I thought that Trashbat was being unfairly blocked instead of Tony Drago but Dan pointed out that Trashbat had made the orginal edit a lot earlier, so it was fair after all. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:20, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Siege mentality ==
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks for moving that. I was trying to do it myself with a name change and redirect but being a sysop has its advantages I guess. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:15, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== [[Contaception]] ==
 
−
 
 
−
Dan, can you move this to its proper title with an '''R''' in it. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:26, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== [[Orthohombic]] ==
 
−
 
 
−
OK here's another one with a missing '''R''' - it should be orthorhombic.  [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:38, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== think i made a mistake ==
 
−
 
 
−
Got your message.  I unblocked him I think before i got your message.  Please make sure I did the unblocking right as i am not too techie here. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:58, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Question ==
 
−
I notice that some sysops protect images.  Do you want me to do that to?[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] <sup>[[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]]</sup> 15:16, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Article Creations==
 
−
Your welcome Dan. I enjoy contributing to this site. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])</sup> 22:44, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== ! ==
 
−
I wanted to undo the Joshua article!  Your to fast.[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] <sup>[[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]]</sup> 23:44, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Thanks ==
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks for your kind welcome.  I am glad to be here.  I hope I can make a positive contribution.  --[[User:ErnstR|ErnstR]] 00:06, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Thanks ==
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks for protecting Joshua.  Recently I have become more aware of the responsibility that we have to avoid efforts at sensationalism or inappropriate edits.  I found one of our articles in an internet search engine, the first one I have seen.  It was listed under atheism.  There, proudly, is the link to conservapedia.  What is the first line of text in the search engine for all to see what conservapedia says?  George Bush states that he doesn't believe atheists should be U.S. citizens... This is what is presented as conservapedia?  When we allow through junk, we sully the reputation of the site... Thanks again... [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:25, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Thanks! (sorry not to have anything different from the above 2) ==
 
−
 
 
−
It's good to be back! Oh, and check out my shiny new hellenised sig!--[[User:Wikinterpreter|'''<font color="#000088">ύι<font color="#220066">κι<font color="#550044"> ντ<font color="#770022">ε<font color="#aa0000">ρ</font>π</font>ρ</font>ετ</font>ηρ</font>''']] <sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]</sup>
 
−
 
 
−
== Tiny typo==
 
−
 
 
−
Hi, hope you don't mind but I am really really picky about punctuation.  I'm not proud of the fact, I just can't help it! In the Bible article, in the King James section, second paragraph, second sentence, it says "it's vocabulary", which should be "its vocabulary".  "It's" is only ever a contraction of "It is".  I wouldn't say anything but I just know there are people like me out there who will see that mistake, roll their eyes, and jump to conclusions (unfairly) about the quality of the article. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 19:09, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
* And then I went and wrote "tint typo" as the description.  That's justice. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 19:10, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
==Chrono Trigger==
 
−
This was a well known video game in the mid 90s. It is definetly noteworthy. Wikipedia and Uncyclopedia both have articles on it.
 
−
 
 
−
== Answers in Creation ==
 
−
 
 
−
So do I get brownie points for creating this one Dan? ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:05, 29 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
You definitely do from me, but probably not from the majority of the sysops. LOL just kidding [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:12, 29 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
Hi Dan, I'm trying for sysop now to join you 'elect' guys.  I know you've put a 'good job' on my page before so I thought I'd ask what you think of my overall contribution to conservapedia.  If you're pleased with my work, I hope you'll drop by and add some comments. Thanks ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:25, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Weimar republic ==
 
−
 
 
−
Why did you remove the stub? It is more than appropriate for this article. [[User:Order]]
 
−
 
 
−
== Protection ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hi Dan,
 
−
 
 
−
We may be at the point where it would be wise to protect Satan (again) and Hell.  I know Satan was opened again to merge in Luficer, but that's been taken care of.  Thanks! [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:05, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Lions Den ==
 
−
 
 
−
Dan with a name like yours was it wise to enter the Lion's Den? :-) [[User:DollarsAndSense|DollarsAndSense]] 16:38, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Cumbernauld ==
 
−
 
 
−
DanH I see you reverted my reversion of this entry.  Channel 4, is an incredibly controversial channel in the UK often broadcating sensationalist programs.  It's main output is a program called Big Brother where members of the public are locked in a house together in order to be voted out by the public.  Even this is fixed as the most sensational members are reinstated to boost viewing figures.  It has featured coed type nude jacuzzi scenes and even live sexual acts.  It also gave a prime-time slot to Richard Dawkins to attack religious belief.  I would not take seriously any reference to programming from this source.  [[User:Alban|Alban]] 17:58, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:Follow the link - [http://www.channel4.com/life/microsites/D/demolition/worst2.html] Or would you prefer a BBC link? Try [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4362410.stm] I have no idea why you have suddenly appeared to defend reversion of my corrections of previous deliberately inserted inaccuracies and falsehoods, but I stand by my edits and the links above refute your opinion. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 18:02, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::Your BBC link actually refers to a protest by the local council against this slur.  [[User:Alban|Alban]] 18:06, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::: A ''slur'' that has seen the town 3 times voted a "carbuncle" etc. Regardless of the news source, the national opinions remain the same. Attacking the edit by claiming it is a liberalist, pornographers' conspiracy is just peurile. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 18:09, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::::If your are going to engage in ''ad hominem'' attacks and name calling then I will not continue this discussion. It is not appropriate language for Conservapedia.  [[User:Dafydd|Dafydd]] 18:15, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:::::The word "peurile" is directed at the action, not the person. And did you forget which sock you were supposed to be using? I thought you were [[User:Alban]]...? Sock-puppetry is also a peurile action. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 18:20, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::::Thank you for your support Dafydd  but as a native Scot I think I know what I'm talking about.  Cumbernauld is not a monstrous carbuncle and deserves better than being derided by a sensationalist sassenach TV station. [[User:Alban|Alban]] 18:18, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:::::Oops! Got the correct puppet on now XD [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 18:20, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::::::Oh yes, very funny. Accuse me of socking.  Just because someone else objects to your abusive language. If you want to continue this discussion further then I suggest you move it to one of our talk pages rather than cluttering up a sysops page.  [[User:Alban|Alban]] 18:32, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:::::::Please refer back to [[User talk:Dafydd|your other talk page]] to see confirmation that you were busted via IP address. Nice try. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 18:37, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Thanks==
 
−
Thanks Dan. I appreciate your support. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 23:29, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Why was my edit reverted?==
 
−
 
 
−
What's wrong?  I'm trying to improve the baraminology article by explaining what the types of people under the Human Holobaramin are.  It's what's in the Bible. [[User:BillJones|BillJones]] 02:02, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
The Mongoloid entry was totally racist.  For one. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 02:26, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Your granny==
 
−
 
 
−
I mean, your grammar: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Skylab&curid=28032&diff=186334&oldid=186289] Nice fix! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:30, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
Thank you. My Grandmother would expect nothing less. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:31, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== South Africa ==
 
−
 
 
−
Dan, there's a lot on this site I disagree with. So be it. But I am glad to see that people here find all those racist bits on South Africa as loathsome as I do. Thanks for nuking all those entries by a guy who seems to be longing for the days of Pik Botha. [[User:Sevenstring|Sevenstring]] 23:15, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Capitals==
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks for the info. I did search under several titles for US Capitals, etc. but no pages came up. Should I ask a sysop to delete my page, or is that unnecessary? [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 15:20, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
I think your page looks good, and better than the other one. Maybe if all the links got fixed that would be best. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:23, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== blocking ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hey how can you find the IP for the user, I dont think I have the checkuser button. lol Sorry I might sound dumb.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 16:19, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
I sent the instructions to you through Conservapedia email. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:21, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::I heard about the email and no one told me how to acess it!--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 16:44, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
How to access your email? It should just be sent to whatever email you signed up to the site with. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:45, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::O thanks. Um Tk told me you also get a email through conservapedia. So I got that confused.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 16:47, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
That may be what he meant. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:47, 5 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:Yes, it was.  Will, if your email is enabled here, users can email you, CP will forward it to your regular email account.  If you reply to them via your email client, they will also have your email.  If you respond to them via the CP "email this user" deal, they will not. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 06:05, 6 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
Should I block Brainslug? Brainslug created Zimbardo Cookie Experiment and has had a 2 hour block in his past. [[User:BethanyS|~Beth~]]
 
−
 
 
−
Yes. If he wants back, he can email you and plead his case. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:17, 6 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Question ==
 
−
 
 
−
How was your paper on [[Putin]]? [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:17, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:well done.  He is not a good guy. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:57, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Andorra ==
 
−
On the matter of [[Andorra]], look at who the edits before me were made by; [[So Alone]] who was blocked for being a sock of this one guy. Do you think his edits are trustworthy? [[User:UnderCurrent|UnderCurrent]] 16:35, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks for pointing that out! Definitely not trustworthy. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:38, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:P.S. Where would one find a compendium on user boxes around here? [[User:UnderCurrent|UnderCurrent]] 16:53, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Userboxes [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:56, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Question ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hello, I was looking at the user creation log and I noticed this:
 
−
 
 
−
15:08, 12 June 2007 HolographicMedia (Talk | contribs | block) created account for User:OpticalEthernet (Talk | contribs | block)
 
−
 
 
−
What happened, and is this allowed? Can users create accounts for others like this?[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 17:56, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
I'm not sure how that works, but I think that without an explanation given, it generally isn't allowed. I know that HolographicMedia was blocked earlier today. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 17:58, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== you missed ==
 
−
I think you missed [[User:MartyFillmore]]. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 18:43, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Image ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hello, Dan. I see you protected an [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Balkans.png image] I uploaded. Did you, by any chance, look at the talk page? The image is a modified version of a Wikipedia image, and I wasn't sure if it was acceptable. Thanks! [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 00:31, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 19:11, June 14, 2007

You slutty man whore!

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanH&oldid=198063"