Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fox News"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I would think that it would be more appropriately said as "Fox News claims to be fair and balanced," or something along those lines. | I would think that it would be more appropriately said as "Fox News claims to be fair and balanced," or something along those lines. | ||
Anyone disagree? | Anyone disagree? | ||
| − | [[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 15:23, 7 March 2007 (EST) | + | --[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 15:23, 7 March 2007 (EST) |
I think this entire article could use an overhaul. Although I am a supporter of Fox News, the bias in this article in very apparent. --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 15:25, 7 March 2007 (EST) | I think this entire article could use an overhaul. Although I am a supporter of Fox News, the bias in this article in very apparent. --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 15:25, 7 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | True. Didn't even notice the "Sean Hannity is a great American" statement at first, which I think is safe to say is an opinion. Also, the reference points to an outdated car giveaway. Doesn't seem like it belongs. | ||
| + | --[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 15:42, 7 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:42, March 7, 2007
Is a citation from Fox News saying that Fox News is fair and balanced really a good idea? I would think that it would be more appropriately said as "Fox News claims to be fair and balanced," or something along those lines. Anyone disagree? --Commodore Guff 15:23, 7 March 2007 (EST)
I think this entire article could use an overhaul. Although I am a supporter of Fox News, the bias in this article in very apparent. --<<-David R->> 15:25, 7 March 2007 (EST)
True. Didn't even notice the "Sean Hannity is a great American" statement at first, which I think is safe to say is an opinion. Also, the reference points to an outdated car giveaway. Doesn't seem like it belongs. --Commodore Guff 15:42, 7 March 2007 (EST)