Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,710 bytes added ,  01:33, June 16, 2007
m
Line 103: Line 103:  
  | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})</ref>
 
  | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})</ref>
 
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department. McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;<ref>
 
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department. McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;<ref>
−
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, and Neumann was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.
+
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.
 
({{cite book
 
({{cite book
 
  | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent
 
  | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent
Line 123: Line 123:  
  | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})</ref>
 
  | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})</ref>
 
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department. McCarthy's list #23;<ref>
 
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department. McCarthy's list #23;<ref>
−
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Identified by McCarthy on the Senate floor on August 9, 1951 as one of the cases he had previously submitted to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. At the time, Chipchin was being investigated by the State Department for being a security/loyalty risk.
+
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.
 
({{cite book
 
({{cite book
 
  | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent
 
  | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent
Line 186: Line 186:  
  | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})</ref>
 
  | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})</ref>
 
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;<ref>
 
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;<ref>
−
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate Erdos' name as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate Arpad Erdos as an example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-securtiy channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.
+
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.
 
({{cite book
 
({{cite book
 
  | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent
 
  | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent
Line 192: Line 192:  
  | title = McCarthy & His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning
 
  | title = McCarthy & His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning
 
  | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.
 
  | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.
−
  | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})</ref>
+
  | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}
 +
{{cite book
 +
| last = McCarthy
 +
| first = Joseph
 +
| year = 1953
 +
| title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951
 +
| publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office
 +
| id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})</ref>
 
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department. McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;<ref>
 
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department. McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;<ref>
 
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, "a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years." According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, "physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities."
 
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, "a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years." According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, "physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities."
Line 207: Line 214:  
  | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})</ref>
 
  | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})</ref>
 
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department. Lee list #106;<ref>
 
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department. Lee list #106;<ref>
−
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate Fishburn as another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-securtiy channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Erdos, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.
+
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.
 
({{cite book
 
({{cite book
 
  | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent
 
  | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent
Line 213: Line 220:  
  | title = McCarthy & His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning
 
  | title = McCarthy & His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning
 
  | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.
 
  | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.
−
  | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})</ref>
+
  | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}
 +
{{cite book
 +
| last = McCarthy
 +
| first = Joseph
 +
| year = 1953
 +
| title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951
 +
| publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office
 +
| id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})</ref>
 
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;<ref>
 
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;<ref>
 
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.
 
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.
428

edits

Navigation menu