Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deism"
(propose moving dispute to Ben Franklin article) |
(Thoughts) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The dispute over whether Franklin was a lifelong Deist would enjoy life ever so much more if it could reside as a section of the [[Benjamin Franklin]] article. So I propose moving most of this dispute there. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:14, 27 March 2007 (EDT) | The dispute over whether Franklin was a lifelong Deist would enjoy life ever so much more if it could reside as a section of the [[Benjamin Franklin]] article. So I propose moving most of this dispute there. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:14, 27 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Thoughts == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thomas Paine was not a Founding Father of America by a long shot, having spent almost his entire life in England. There is no one founder of deism, as the concepts and ideas have been around for much longer than the 1600's. The only thing the "founder" adds is confusion by having concepts that really don't make much sense together. There is God, but He's stepped aside and does not take any personal role in events, but yet there's also a heaven and a moral standard used for who goes there on a personal one on one basis. Is He a personal God or is He aloof? It appears to be both simultaneously. One can see why deism died out relatively quickly under those conditions. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:55, 19 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:55, June 19, 2007
What did Jefferson say about his religious beliefs? The fact that he did not call himself a does not mean that he was not one; his beliefs (about Jesus at any rate) seem to be deist. Maybe he described himself as something else? If so it would be worth mentioning.
--BenjaminS 22:52, 30 January 2007 (EST)
I think that we should define Deism according the same way as the founder of deism did. not the way that modern dictionaries do. --TimSvendsen 10:14, 31 January 2007 (EST)
- I think we should mention both and note the differences... Dpbsmith 11:03, 31 January 2007 (EST)
- Yeah, We should probably mention both, but for purposes of determining who was or wasn't a deist, we need to have a fixed standard, and I think that the founder's version should be used. --TimSvendsen 11:21, 31 January 2007 (EST)
Controversy over Ben Franklin
The dispute over whether Franklin was a lifelong Deist would enjoy life ever so much more if it could reside as a section of the Benjamin Franklin article. So I propose moving most of this dispute there. --Ed Poor 12:14, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
Thoughts
Thomas Paine was not a Founding Father of America by a long shot, having spent almost his entire life in England. There is no one founder of deism, as the concepts and ideas have been around for much longer than the 1600's. The only thing the "founder" adds is confusion by having concepts that really don't make much sense together. There is God, but He's stepped aside and does not take any personal role in events, but yet there's also a heaven and a moral standard used for who goes there on a personal one on one basis. Is He a personal God or is He aloof? It appears to be both simultaneously. One can see why deism died out relatively quickly under those conditions. Learn together 16:55, 19 June 2007 (EDT)