Difference between revisions of "Talk:Falsifiability of evolution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == Misconceptions about the Theory of Evolution == Many people assume the "Theory of Evolution" is a single theory. It is not. Rather, it is a collection of 1,000,000+ theories, papers,...)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
A common false assumption made is that disproving one of the underlying theories, invalidates the entire theory of evolution.  Unlike the Bible, evolutionary theory does not claim to be Inerrant.  An error in a single theory does not disprove the larger body of knowledge.  Falsifying  the "Theory of Evolution" would require disproving thousands of supporting theories.[[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]] 16:23, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 
A common false assumption made is that disproving one of the underlying theories, invalidates the entire theory of evolution.  Unlike the Bible, evolutionary theory does not claim to be Inerrant.  An error in a single theory does not disprove the larger body of knowledge.  Falsifying  the "Theory of Evolution" would require disproving thousands of supporting theories.[[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]] 16:23, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
:So you are agreeing that evolution per se is not falsifiable?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:43, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:43, June 21, 2007

Misconceptions about the Theory of Evolution

Many people assume the "Theory of Evolution" is a single theory. It is not. Rather, it is a collection of 1,000,000+ theories, papers, experiments, observations and tests, all of which contribute to the overall theory of evolution". The Bible is similarly comprised of a collection of books which are a collection of verses.

A common false assumption made is that disproving one of the underlying theories, invalidates the entire theory of evolution. Unlike the Bible, evolutionary theory does not claim to be Inerrant. An error in a single theory does not disprove the larger body of knowledge. Falsifying the "Theory of Evolution" would require disproving thousands of supporting theories.PerpetualAngst 16:23, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

So you are agreeing that evolution per se is not falsifiable? Philip J. Rayment 09:43, 21 June 2007 (EDT)