Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 38: Line 38:  
While not everyone will agree with every defense of PE they make, it’s hard to argue with their call for more “qualitative studies that take account of all relevant perspectives instead of relying only on a managerial, private equity firm, employee, or trade union perspectives."[https://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-careers/09/private-equity.asp#:~:text=They%20emphasize%20the%20ability%20of,streamlining%20operations%20and%20driving%20growth.]
 
While not everyone will agree with every defense of PE they make, it’s hard to argue with their call for more “qualitative studies that take account of all relevant perspectives instead of relying only on a managerial, private equity firm, employee, or trade union perspectives."[https://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-careers/09/private-equity.asp#:~:text=They%20emphasize%20the%20ability%20of,streamlining%20operations%20and%20driving%20growth.]
   −
A question I have about the private equity field is what is the alternative and why has the industry seen a big jump? Does the article address these two questions?  
+
Two questions I have about the private equity field are: What is the alternative and why has the industry seen a big jump? Does the article address these two questions?  
    
Here is my guess. The 2007/2008 crisis saw a drying up of banker money and private equity stepped in. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:01, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
 
Here is my guess. The 2007/2008 crisis saw a drying up of banker money and private equity stepped in. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:01, May 24, 2024 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,743

edits

Navigation menu