Difference between revisions of "Talk:No Child Left Behind"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'll include more sources. And that's the whole point. If the law is flawed, then of course they'll be trouble carrying it out. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 13:52, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | I'll include more sources. And that's the whole point. If the law is flawed, then of course they'll be trouble carrying it out. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 13:52, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why do we keep reverting to the NEA? I'm not with the NEA, and I agree with those points (I've been a teacher for ten years). [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 12:27, 22 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:27, June 22, 2007
It's not just NEA criticism, if you look at the sources. If I include other sources, can we stick with 'educator criticism'? Czolgolz 12:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
- Sure looks to me like the NEA's website, and it's rather short on specifics as to why NEA has trouble carrying out its job mandated by law. RobS 13:20, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
I'll include more sources. And that's the whole point. If the law is flawed, then of course they'll be trouble carrying it out. Czolgolz 13:52, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Why do we keep reverting to the NEA? I'm not with the NEA, and I agree with those points (I've been a teacher for ten years). Maestro 12:27, 22 June 2007 (EDT)