| Line 232: |
Line 232: |
| | [https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-harrowing-detail-nyt-shows-weaponization-of-rape-sexual-violence-during-oct-7/] 'In harrowing detail, NYT reports on weaponization of rape, sexual violence on Oct. 7. | | [https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-harrowing-detail-nyt-shows-weaponization-of-rape-sexual-violence-during-oct-7/] 'In harrowing detail, NYT reports on weaponization of rape, sexual violence on Oct. 7. |
| | Publication uncovers new information, devastating testimony, on systemic targeting of women and girls, use of sexual assault and mutilation during savage Hamas onslaught in Israel.'</small></blockquote></ref> | | Publication uncovers new information, devastating testimony, on systemic targeting of women and girls, use of sexual assault and mutilation during savage Hamas onslaught in Israel.'</small></blockquote></ref> |
| − | ===Whitewashing hate (at 'swastika palestine' protests)===
| |
| | | | |
| − | Report: Scrubbed by the ‘Times.’
| + | '''Ferocious''' |
| − | The New York Times routinely erases extremism from "pro-Palestinian" protests, including praise for Hitler and calls for murder. Examples include, when covering the events in: Washington, Manhattan, Brooklyn, UCLA.
| |
| − | <ref>[https://www.jns.org/scrubbed-by-the-times/ Scrubbed by the ‘Times.’ The New York Times routinely erases extremism from "pro-Palestinian" protests]. Gilead Ini. June 18, 2024 / CAMERA</ref>
| |
| | | | |
| | June 2024: | | June 2024: |
| Line 242: |
Line 239: |
| | Article: 'Ferocious’ [sic] Israel, ‘Rabidly Partisan’ Adelson.' 'For a telltale indicator of New York Times bias, keep an eye on the adjectives and adverbs. Two recent front-page Times articles offer examples of this particular problem skewing the coverage. A Times article purporting to show how Israelis “feel little sympathy” for Gazans suffering includes the line, “Michael Zigdon, who operates a small food shack in Netivot’s rundown market and had employed two men from Gaza until the attack, expressed little sympathy for Gazans, who have endured a ferocious Israeli military onslaught for the past eight months.” The “ferocious” adjective gets hurled by the Times a second time in the same article, which goes on, in case any reader failed to absorb the point the first time, to say that “the death toll in Gaza has spiraled to at least 37,000 since Israel began its ferocious offensive.” | | Article: 'Ferocious’ [sic] Israel, ‘Rabidly Partisan’ Adelson.' 'For a telltale indicator of New York Times bias, keep an eye on the adjectives and adverbs. Two recent front-page Times articles offer examples of this particular problem skewing the coverage. A Times article purporting to show how Israelis “feel little sympathy” for Gazans suffering includes the line, “Michael Zigdon, who operates a small food shack in Netivot’s rundown market and had employed two men from Gaza until the attack, expressed little sympathy for Gazans, who have endured a ferocious Israeli military onslaught for the past eight months.” The “ferocious” adjective gets hurled by the Times a second time in the same article, which goes on, in case any reader failed to absorb the point the first time, to say that “the death toll in Gaza has spiraled to at least 37,000 since Israel began its ferocious offensive.” |
| | The Israeli self-defense operation gets described by the Times as “ferocious,” [“a ferocious Israeli military onslaught”] while the Hamas attack of Oct. 7 earns no such label. My Webster’s Second defines ferocious as “having or exhibiting ferocity, cruelty, savagery, etc; violently cruel.” Ferocity is defined as coming from the Latin root ferus, meaning wild, “as the ferocity of barbarians.” That qualifies as slander of Israel, opinion masquerading as New York Times news writing. If the Times news writers and editors want to accuse Israel of waging barbaric, savage...'<ref>[https://www.algemeiner.com/2024/06/28/jewish-leader-slams-new-york-times-dreadful-bias-paper-faults-ferocious-israel-rabidly-partisan-adelson/ Ferocious’ (sic) Israel, ‘Rabidly Partisan’ Adelson]. Ny Ira Stoll, ''Algemeiner'', June 28, 2024</ref> | | The Israeli self-defense operation gets described by the Times as “ferocious,” [“a ferocious Israeli military onslaught”] while the Hamas attack of Oct. 7 earns no such label. My Webster’s Second defines ferocious as “having or exhibiting ferocity, cruelty, savagery, etc; violently cruel.” Ferocity is defined as coming from the Latin root ferus, meaning wild, “as the ferocity of barbarians.” That qualifies as slander of Israel, opinion masquerading as New York Times news writing. If the Times news writers and editors want to accuse Israel of waging barbaric, savage...'<ref>[https://www.algemeiner.com/2024/06/28/jewish-leader-slams-new-york-times-dreadful-bias-paper-faults-ferocious-israel-rabidly-partisan-adelson/ Ferocious’ (sic) Israel, ‘Rabidly Partisan’ Adelson]. Ny Ira Stoll, ''Algemeiner'', June 28, 2024</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Whitewashing hate (at 'swastika palestine' protests)=== |
| | + | |
| | + | Report: Scrubbed by the ‘Times.’ |
| | + | The New York Times routinely erases extremism from "pro-Palestinian" protests, including praise for Hitler and calls for murder. Examples include, when covering the events in: Washington, Manhattan, Brooklyn, UCLA. |
| | + | <ref>[https://www.jns.org/scrubbed-by-the-times/ Scrubbed by the ‘Times.’ The New York Times routinely erases extremism from "pro-Palestinian" protests]. Gilead Ini. June 18, 2024 / CAMERA</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ===Raja Abdulrahim=== | | ===Raja Abdulrahim=== |