Difference between revisions of "Talk:Volgograd"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Can this be relevant? [[User:Leopeo|Leopeo]] 10:46, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
Can this be relevant? [[User:Leopeo|Leopeo]] 10:46, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:It appears so.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:28, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:It appears so.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:28, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Moved==
 +
Moved from '''Stalingrad''' to '''Volgograd''' - Stalingrad, as a proper noun, does not exist. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 19:55, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 23:55, June 25, 2007

The turning point

It's the turning point of the war, not only of the war in Russia. The war in Africa was never considered as important as the Eastern Front. How many divisions did Rommel have in Africa?Leopeo 02:36, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

Loftus - Aarons

Can this be relevant? Leopeo 10:46, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

It appears so. RobS 15:28, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

Moved

Moved from Stalingrad to Volgograd - Stalingrad, as a proper noun, does not exist. --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 19:55, 25 June 2007 (EDT)