Difference between revisions of "Monkey"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DrSandstone (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''monkey''' is a [[polypheletic]] classification of any long tailed [[primate]] that is not a [[prosimian]]. Varieties of them can be found in [[South America]], [[Africa]] and [[Asia]]. [[Evolutionists]] believe that [[humans]] and monkeys share a common ancestor, which is disputed by [[creation scientists]]. | A '''monkey''' is a [[polypheletic]] classification of any long tailed [[primate]] that is not a [[prosimian]]. Varieties of them can be found in [[South America]], [[Africa]] and [[Asia]]. [[Evolutionists]] believe that [[humans]] and monkeys share a common ancestor, which is disputed by [[creation scientists]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Stephen Hawking Opposes Evolution== | ||
| + | It has become apparent as of late that Stephen Hawking has recanted in his acceptance of the Theory of Evolution. He has come out in disapproval of the theory and now states there is absolutely no evidence to support such a theory. Additionally, he asserts that scientists have "naively" accepted this theory and have not done so on the basis of the objective evidence supporting it, as there is absolutely none. <ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GO2l7ziEIuk Stephen Hawking Denies Evolution]</ref> | ||
[[Category:Primates]] | [[Category:Primates]] | ||
| + | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 01:26, June 26, 2007
A monkey is a polypheletic classification of any long tailed primate that is not a prosimian. Varieties of them can be found in South America, Africa and Asia. Evolutionists believe that humans and monkeys share a common ancestor, which is disputed by creation scientists.
Stephen Hawking Opposes Evolution
It has become apparent as of late that Stephen Hawking has recanted in his acceptance of the Theory of Evolution. He has come out in disapproval of the theory and now states there is absolutely no evidence to support such a theory. Additionally, he asserts that scientists have "naively" accepted this theory and have not done so on the basis of the objective evidence supporting it, as there is absolutely none. [1]