72
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: +
Talk:Falsifiability of evolution (view source)
Revision as of 02:19, June 26, 2007
, 02:19, June 26, 2007→Misconceptions about the Theory of Evolution
:::::::::::: As given, you answer is correct to within 5x10<sup>-3</sup>G. That is what science seeks to do: make the error bars as small as possible. [[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]] 17:36, 25 Jun 2007 (PDT)
:::::::::::: As given, you answer is correct to within 5x10<sup>-3</sup>G. That is what science seeks to do: make the error bars as small as possible. [[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]] 17:36, 25 Jun 2007 (PDT)
::::::::::::: Agreed. And the magic of falsifiable science is that you ''can'' move toward that improvement. But with unfalsifiable hypothesis, you can just pick one error you're emotionally attached to, and stick with it 'cause it can't be tested. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 20:56, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
::::::::::::: Agreed. And the magic of falsifiable science is that you ''can'' move toward that improvement. But with unfalsifiable hypothesis, you can just pick one error you're emotionally attached to, and stick with it 'cause it can't be tested. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 20:56, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
::::::::::Hubble Deep Field image showed light from galaxies 12 billion light years from earth. The estimation of the time it took the light to reach earth was based on the observed redshift values of galaxies in the image. Do you contend that this estimate is false because it is not falsifiable? The light was emitted 12 billion years ago. Is it wrong because it is simply an ''interpretation of the evidence''?
== Evolution Is False ==
== Evolution Is False ==