Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
[[Image:Hitler7.JPG|right|300px|thumb|Adolf Hitler]]
+
'''Intellectual dishonesty''' is lying about or concealing one's own beliefs.  
'''Intellectual dishonesty''' is lying about or concealing one's own beliefs. [[Liberals]], and those on the [[leftist|left]], are far more inclined to this form of [[deceit]] than conservatives.
      
[[Charles Murray]] provides an example of [[liberal]] intellectual dishonesty:
 
[[Charles Murray]] provides an example of [[liberal]] intellectual dishonesty:
:In their heart of hearts, intellectual elites, especially [[liberal]] ones, have two nasty secrets regarding [[IQ]]. First, they really believe that IQ is the be-all and end-all of human excellence and that someone with a low IQ is inferior. Second, they are already sure that the black - white IQ difference is predominantly genetic and that this is a calamity -- such a calamity indeed that it must not be spoken about, even to oneself. To raise these issues holds a mirror up to the elites' most desperately denied inner thoughts. <ref>http://www.eugenics.net/papers/mssel.html</ref>
+
:In their heart of hearts, intellectual elites, especially [[liberal]] ones, have two nasty secrets regarding [[IQ]]. First, they really believe that IQ is the be-all and end-all of human excellence and that someone with a low IQ is inferior. Second, they are already sure that the black - white IQ difference is predominantly genetic and that this is a calamity -- such a calamity indeed that it must not be spoken about, even to oneself. To raise these issues holds a mirror up to the elites' most desperately denied inner thoughts.<ref>http://www.eugenics.net/papers/mssel.html</ref>
 +
 
 +
Intellectual dishonesty often arises when incentives exist for people to advocate stances that they know to be wrong. For instance, handlers{{who}} of political candidates may encourage them to adopt positions that will be popular with the people, regardless of what their personal opinions may be.
 +
 
 +
*There is a tradition in politics that is similar to one in the legal profession: When evidence supports your position, make your argument based on the evidence, but when it argues against your position, ignore the evidence and appeal to emotion. [https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/09/20/climate-change-cultists-vs-scientific-evidence/]
 +
 
 +
== See also ==
 +
 
 +
*[[Deceit]]
 +
 
 +
Antonym:
 +
 
 +
*[[Honesty]]
    
==References==
 
==References==
Line 9: Line 20:  
<References/>
 
<References/>
   −
[[category:politics]]
+
{{liberalism}}
[[Category:Liberals]]
+
 
 +
[[Category:Political Terms]]
 +
[[Category:Liberal Deceit]]
 +
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,900

edits

Navigation menu