Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Stone Table"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The reversion was simple. It was making a comparison of a magical table in a fictional book to be similar to Jesus' death and resurrection. It trivializes the Gospel account, or it slaps Christians across the face. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:17, 27 June 2007 (EDT) | :The reversion was simple. It was making a comparison of a magical table in a fictional book to be similar to Jesus' death and resurrection. It trivializes the Gospel account, or it slaps Christians across the face. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:17, 27 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, that was the metaphor Lewis was going for in the book... [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:21, 27 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:21, June 28, 2007
I'm confused about this reversion. DanH 22:14, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
As am I. JoshuaZ 22:15, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
- The reversion was simple. It was making a comparison of a magical table in a fictional book to be similar to Jesus' death and resurrection. It trivializes the Gospel account, or it slaps Christians across the face. Karajou 22:17, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
Well, that was the metaphor Lewis was going for in the book... DanH 22:21, 27 June 2007 (EDT)