Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Stone Table"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Right.  It's an allegory, to introduce children to hte principle of divine sacrifice & love.  I loved that book as a kid, and studied Lewis & Tolkein extensively.  They're great books that teach Christian morals.  Not trivializations.  Lewis was a deeply Christian man (as was Tolkein) and Lewis tried to show it in his writing.  Karajou, what he did was good.-[[User:Phoenix|Phoenix]] 22:22, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 
Right.  It's an allegory, to introduce children to hte principle of divine sacrifice & love.  I loved that book as a kid, and studied Lewis & Tolkein extensively.  They're great books that teach Christian morals.  Not trivializations.  Lewis was a deeply Christian man (as was Tolkein) and Lewis tried to show it in his writing.  Karajou, what he did was good.-[[User:Phoenix|Phoenix]] 22:22, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:Then should such an edit have been properly explained in the first place?  I'm for the explanation, but not the trivialization of it.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:24, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:Then should such an edit have been properly explained in the first place?  I'm for the explanation, but not the trivialization of it.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:24, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
I'd do it but I'm currently playing Nintendo DS :-).  Get back to you in a bit.-[[User:Phoenix|Phoenix]] 22:31, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:31, June 28, 2007

I'm confused about this reversion. DanH 22:14, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

As am I. JoshuaZ 22:15, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

The reversion was simple. It was making a comparison of a magical table in a fictional book to be similar to Jesus' death and resurrection. It trivializes the Gospel account, or it slaps Christians across the face. Karajou 22:17, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

Well, that was the metaphor Lewis was going for in the book... DanH 22:21, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

Right. It's an allegory, to introduce children to hte principle of divine sacrifice & love. I loved that book as a kid, and studied Lewis & Tolkein extensively. They're great books that teach Christian morals. Not trivializations. Lewis was a deeply Christian man (as was Tolkein) and Lewis tried to show it in his writing. Karajou, what he did was good.-Phoenix 22:22, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

Then should such an edit have been properly explained in the first place? I'm for the explanation, but not the trivialization of it. Karajou 22:24, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

I'd do it but I'm currently playing Nintendo DS :-). Get back to you in a bit.-Phoenix 22:31, 27 June 2007 (EDT)